Daniel Evans vs Ji Sung Nam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Evans vs J. Sung Nam

Daniel Evans
GBR
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
35
Age
32
5'9" (175 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
183
C. Rank
692
21
Best Rank
236
2
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$5.2M
Career Money
$1.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Ji Sung Nam
KOR
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
35
Age
32
5'9" (175 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
183
C. Rank
692
21
Best Rank
236
2
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$5.2M
Career Money
$1.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Evans 1 - 0 Nam
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Evans winning 2 and Ji Sung Nam winning 0. The last match between Daniel Evans and Ji Sung Nam was at the Busan Challenger, 05-05-2016, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Daniel Evans getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Evans | 1 |
| Nam | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Busan Challenger(05-05-16)
Daniel Evans
6
6
Ji Sung Nam
3
2
D. Evans vs J. S. Nam H2H Profile
D. Evans vs J. S. Nam Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel Evans has won 43.68% of points on their second serve, while Ji Sung Nam has won 41.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel Evans, in recent form, has won 47.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ji Sung Nam has won 47.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.63% and 27.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Daniel Evans has saved 53.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ji Sung Nam has saved 55.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel Evans has won 46.81% of matches played (W/L 22/25), with Ji Sung Nam winning 56.10% (W/L 23/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Daniel Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 169/104), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 54/63). Ji Sung Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 257/187), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Daniel Evans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/15), where as Ji Sung Nam has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 16/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Daniel Evans winning 1 times and Ji Sung Nam being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Evans winning 2 and Ji Sung Nam winning 0.
- The last match between Daniel Evans and Ji Sung Nam was at the Busan Challenger, 05-05-2016, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Daniel Evans getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:4:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel Evans has played against opponents with an average rank of 219.36 while Ji Sung Nam has played against players with an average rank of 380.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel Evans has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ji Sung Nam has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel Evans has converted 38.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ji Sung Nam has converted 42.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Daniel Evans vs Ji Sung Nam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Evans vs J. S. Nam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:4:0 | Average Match Time | 1:4:0 |
| 67% (33/49) | 1st Serve % | 75% (38/51) |
| 82% (27/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (23/38) |
| 50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (4/13) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (24/51) | Return Points Win % | 29% (14/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Evans 48%, Nam 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Evans 51%, Nam 57%.
Break Points Saved %: Evans 55%, Nam 53%.
D. Evans Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 4-6 1-2 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 7-6(7) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 3-6 2-2 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
J. S. Nam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(8) 6-4 7-6(6) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

D. Evans vs J. S. Nam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.90% (589/411) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.34% (311/241) |
| 56.88% (1398/1060) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.80% (698/553) |
| 52.28% (12366/11289) | Games Win/Loss | 52.37% (6070/5520) |
| 60.91% (254/163) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.88% (257/187) |
| 46.15% (54/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (28/28) |
| 61.56% (181/113) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.02% (25/24) |
| 58.14% (100/72) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2819 | Aces Total | 1047 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2037 | Total Double Faults | 982 |
| 1:8:24 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 492.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 577.9 |
| 61% (30518/50133) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14629/22558) |
| 71% (21652/30518) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9882/14629) |
| 51% (9937/19614) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3878/7929) |
| 41% (1902/4621) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1184/2688) |
| 38% (19172/50158) | Return Points Win % | 43% (10166/23771) |
| 51.61% (48/45) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 41.77% (33/46) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.48% (20/26) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 52.56% (113/102) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 61.23% (169/107) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (112/112) |
| 70.93% (205/84) | Futures W/L | 61.71% (195/121) |
| 60% (545/902) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (301/536) |
| 46% (40/87) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 53% (189/359) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (77/144) |
| 54% (184/339) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (74/156) |
| 85% (581/492) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (311/266) |
| 15% (581/86) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (311/44) |
| 24% (418/99) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (240/45) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction08:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction07:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction03:10 PM 17/11/25
Prediction10:00 PM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
13:55
H2H 0-0
14:50
H2H 0-0
15:05
H2H 0-0
15:10
H2H 0-0
15:20
H2H 0-0